We don't usually post entire articles on our blog, but the following article is so important, I wanted the whole thing.  So many people are homeless in Springfield, or about to be homeless, and, as Ehrenreich sums up, 70% of us are headed toward homelessness if our revolution does not succeed.
Throw Them Out With the Trash 
Why Homelessness Is Becoming an Occupy Wall Street Issue 
By Barbara Ehrenreich
As anyone knows who has ever had to set up a military encampment or   build a village from the ground up, occupations pose staggering   logistical problems. Large numbers of people must be fed and kept   reasonably warm and dry. Trash has to be removed; medical care and   rudimentary security provided -- to which ends a dozen or more   committees may toil night and day. But for the individual occupier, one   problem often overshadows everything else, including job loss, the   destruction of the middle class, and the reign of the 1%. And that is   the single question: Where am I going to pee?
Some of the Occupy Wall Street encampments now spreading across the   U.S. have access to Port-o-Potties (Freedom Plaza in Washington, D.C.)   or, better yet, restrooms with sinks and running water (Fort Wayne,   Indiana). Others require their residents to forage on their own. At   Zuccotti Park, just blocks from Wall Street, this means long waits for   the restroom at a nearby Burger King or somewhat shorter ones at a   Starbucks a block away. At McPherson Square in D.C., a twenty-something   occupier showed me the pizza parlor where she can cop a pee during the   hours it’s open, as well as the alley where she crouches late at night.   Anyone with restroom-related issues -- arising from age, pregnancy,   prostate problems, or irritable bowel syndrome -- should prepare to join   the revolution in diapers.
        Of course, political protesters do not face the challenges of urban  camping alone. Homeless people confront the same issues every day: how  to scrape together meals, keep warm at night by covering themselves with  cardboard or tarp, and relieve themselves without committing a crime.  Public restrooms are sparse in American cities -- "as if the need to go  to the bathroom does not exist," travel expert Arthur Frommer once observed.   And yet to yield to bladder pressure is to risk arrest. A report  entitled “Criminalizing Crisis,” to be released later this month by the  National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, recounts the following  story from Wenatchee, Washington:
"Toward the end of  2010, a family of two parents and three children that had been  experiencing homelessness for a year and a half applied for a 2-bedroom  apartment. The day before a scheduled meeting with the apartment manager  during the final stages of acquiring the lease, the father of the  family was arrested for public urination. The arrest occurred at an hour  when no public restrooms were available for use. Due to the arrest, the  father was unable to make the appointment with the apartment manager  and the property was rented out to another person. As of March 2011, the  family was still homeless and searching for housing."
What the Occupy Wall Streeters are beginning to discover, and  homeless people have known all along, is that most ordinary,  biologically necessary activities are illegal when performed in American  streets -- not just peeing, but sitting, lying down, and sleeping.  While the laws vary from city to city, one of the harshest is in Sarasota, Florida,  which passed an ordinance in 2005 that makes it illegal to “engage in  digging or earth-breaking activities” -- that is, to build a latrine --  cook, make a fire, or be asleep and “when awakened state that he or she  has no other place to live.”
It is illegal,  in other words, to be homeless or live outdoors for any other reason.  It should be noted, though, that there are no laws requiring cities to  provide food, shelter, or restrooms for their indigent citizens.
The current prohibition on homelessness began to take shape in the  1980s, along with the ferocious growth of the financial industry (Wall  Street and all its tributaries throughout the nation). That was also the  era in which we stopped being a nation that manufactured much beyond  weightless, invisible “financial products,” leaving the old industrial  working class to carve out a livelihood at places like Wal-Mart.
As it turned out, the captains of the new “casino economy” -- the  stock brokers and investment bankers -- were highly sensitive, one might  say finicky, individuals, easily offended by having to step over the  homeless in the streets or bypass them in commuter train stations. In an  economy where a centimillionaire could turn into a billionaire  overnight, the poor and unwashed were a major buzzkill. Starting with  Mayor Rudy Giuliani in New York, city after city passed “broken windows”  or “quality of life” ordinances making it dangerous for the homeless to  loiter or, in some cases, even look “indigent,” in public spaces.
No one has yet tallied all the suffering occasioned by this crackdown  -- the deaths from cold and exposure -- but “Criminalizing Crisis”  offers this story about a homeless pregnant woman in Columbia, South  Carolina:
"During daytime  hours, when she could not be inside of a shelter, she attempted to spend  time in a museum and was told to leave. She then attempted to sit on a  bench outside the museum and was again told to relocate. In several  other instances, still during her pregnancy, the woman was told that she  could not sit in a local park during the day because she would be  ‘squatting.’ In early 2011, about six months into her pregnancy, the  homeless woman began to feel unwell, went to a hospital, and delivered a  stillborn child."
Well before Tahrir Square was a twinkle in anyone’s eye, and even  before the recent recession, homeless Americans had begun to act in  their own defense, creating organized encampments, usually tent cities,  in vacant lots or wooded areas. These communities often feature various  elementary forms of self-governance: food from local charities has to  be distributed, latrines dug, rules -- such as no drugs, weapons, or  violence -- enforced. With all due credit to the Egyptian democracy  movement, the Spanish indignados, and rebels all over the world, tent cities are the domestic progenitors of the American occupation movement.
There is nothing “political” about these settlements of the homeless  -- no signs denouncing greed or visits from leftwing luminaries -- but  they have been treated with far less official forbearance than the  occupation encampments of the “American autumn.” LA’s Skid Row endures  constant police harassment, for example, but when it rained, Mayor  Antonio Villaraigosa had ponchos distributed to nearby Occupy LA.
All over the country, in the last few years, police have moved in on  the tent cities of the homeless, one by one, from Seattle to Wooster,  Sacramento to Providence, in raids that often leave the former occupants  without even their minimal possessions. In Chattanooga, Tennessee, last  summer, a charity outreach worker explained  the forcible dispersion of a local tent city by saying, “The city will  not tolerate a tent city. That’s been made very clear to us. The camps  have to be out of sight.”
What occupiers from all walks of life are discovering, at least every  time they contemplate taking a leak, is that to be homeless in America  is to live like a fugitive. The destitute are our own native-born  “illegals,” facing prohibitions on the most basic activities of  survival. They are not supposed to soil public space with their urine,  their feces, or their exhausted bodies. Nor are they supposed to spoil  the landscape with their unusual wardrobe choices or body odors. They  are, in fact, supposed to die, and preferably to do so without leaving a  corpse for the dwindling public sector to transport, process, and burn.
But the occupiers are not from all walks of life, just from  those walks that slope downwards -- from debt, joblessness, and  foreclosure -- leading eventually to pauperism and the streets. Some of  the present occupiers were homeless to start with, attracted to the  occupation encampments by the prospect of free food and at least  temporary shelter from police harassment. Many others are drawn from the  borderline-homeless “nouveau poor,” and normally encamp on friends’  couches or parents’ folding beds.
In Portland, Austin, and Philadelphia, the Occupy Wall Street  movement is taking up the cause of the homeless as its own, which of  course it is. Homelessness is not a side issue unconnected to plutocracy  and greed. It’s where we’re all eventually headed -- the 99%, or at  least the 70%, of us, every debt-loaded college grad, out-of-work school  teacher, and impoverished senior -- unless this revolution succeeds.
Barbara Ehrenreich, TomDispatch regular, is the author of Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America (now in a 10th anniversary edition with a new afterword).